[ Wednesday, April 09, 2003 ]
Rumor Mill News Agents Forum
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?noframes;read=29495
BUSHARON WILL ATTACK SYRIA LEBANON:MATTER of TIME
Posted By: ArtBishop
Date: Wednesday, 5 March 2003, 5:49 p.m.
In Response To: ISRAEL TO OPEN IRAQ INVASION CORRIDORS THROUGH SYRIA? (Rosalinda)
SHARON HAS NUKES AND HAS threatened to use them.Thats why its of UTMOST IMPORTANCE that the U.N SEND INSPECTORS in to DISARM ISRAELs W eapons of MASS DESTRUCTION BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!
ISRAELS W MD'S
THAT SHOULD BE THE REAL TARGET.
THAT IS THE THREAT TO THE MIDDLE EAST EUROPE AND THE WHOLE WORLD.
VERY NUCLEAR
VERY DANGEROUSHARON
REAL TARGET IRAN???AND SYRIA??? AND LEBANON???
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=25700
Posted By: ArtBishop
Date: Monday, 11 November 2002, 9:03 p.m.
In Response To: REAL TARGET IRAN??? (TJHines)
Syria and Lebanon TARGETS.
Sitting Ducks.
Why ?
Cause MR.Eagleburger from the A-Team of Zionists said so.
COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT of C-Team Zionist Tony (Z) Snow/Lawrence (Z) Eagleburger Below:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60704,00.html (BOOKMARK IT)
SNOW: What targets could be more important than Iraq?
EAGLEBURGER: But what's happening because of this whole focus on Saddam Hussein, we are losing our focus on the terrorist war, and that worries me a lot as well. There are a lot of other terrorist targets we ought to be focusing on.
SNOW: Such as?
EAGLEBURGER: And I'm afraid that, because we focus so much on Iraq, we're losing that sight.
SNOW: What are those targets? WHAT ARE THEY? SPIT IT OUT EAGLEBURGER!
EAGLEBURGER: Well, there is SYRIA, for example, which is pumping through -- because of IRAN, is pumping weapons on into HEZBOLAH and so forth -- we ought to be -- which is then producing a lot oFAGONY in Palestine and in Israel. We ought to be doing a bit to try to stop that.
There's HEZBOLAH, there's HAMAS, there is a whole range of terrorist targets out there related to Palestine and to ISRAEL that we ought to be trying to deal with."
BINGO! Straight from the Zionist Shoulder.
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=22462
We have a Syrian Accountability Act when we should be DEMANDING an Israeli Accountability Act.
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=22865
BUSHARON will ATTACK SYRIA LEBANON:MATTER of TIME
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=23293
.
.
.
WE CAN NOT THANK YOU ENOUGH FOR THE NUCLEAR W ARNING ROSALINDA!
ANYONEBUTGEORGE IN 2004!
: March 4 (EIRNS)--A WELL-PLACED ISRAELI SOURCE SAID
: THAT ISRAEL HAS SUBMITTED MAPS TO THE PENTAGON
: ON ALTERNATIVE INVASION CORRIDORS INTO IRAQ.
: In the aftermath of the Turkish Parliamentary vote last week,
: Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz has reportedly
: sent maps and invasion corridor proposals to the Pentagon,
: according to a well-placed Israeli source.
: According to the report, Israel is proposing to stage an
: incident
: to justify an IDF incursion into Syria, to cut a corridor into
: central western Iraq, which could be used to supply American
: troops from the 101st Airborne Division, who would be dropped
: into northern Iraq. Already, the source indicated a build-up
: of
: Israeli tanks along the Syrian border, in order to provoke a
: Syrian mis-step to justify heavy Israeli military actions.
: Despite Sharon's desperation to get the Iraq war going, so
: Israel can pursue its own brutal plans for the occupied
: territories, Lebanon and Syria, the source indicated that many
: Israeli military officials believe that the U.S. is not yet
: ready
: to launch the war, and that any kind of war will be taking an
: enormous risk. In an unsolicited remark, he cited the North
: Korean crisis as the second front in the global crisis that
: would
: explode, were Bush to give the order to American forces to
: invade Iraq.
: [source: Ria Novosti, March 4, 2003, per Fed News]
: THE DANGER THE U.S. MIGHT USE NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN IRAQ was a
: sub-theme at a Moscow press conference March 4, held by two
: members of the Federal Council Defense and Security Committee.
: Vasily Klyuchenok, a lieutenant-general of aviation, opened
: his
: remarks by stating his concern that whereas, Iraq had made
: military history through its use of chemical weapons, the U.S.
: had demonstrated, during the bombings of Hiroshima and
: Nagasaki,
: that nuclear weapons could also be used. He described these as
: "vicious" priorities, and said that it cannot be
: guaranteed that
: these things wouldn't happen again.
: "Or, if the conflict goes much further, then ...
: will it not become the prologue for a third world war
: involving the use of quite serious means of destruction,
: and with much more serious consequences for all the
: participants?"
: Later, asked about whether he was forecasting a Third World
: War, he said, he hoped not, but that he had expressed his
: concerns. Asked whether the U.S. may use low-yield nuclear
: bombs,
: he said that he could not rule this out. He also said he had
: raised this danger to the Americans.
: On a slightly different note, when asked if he thought a
: certain stage of military deployment would make it impossible
: to
: stop, he said no. "All troops operate by command.... This
: could
: be described as exercises and one can get out of this
: situation
: with dignity in general."
: It is perhaps also of note that the moderator of the press
: conference started off saying that it's likely Washington will
: hit Iraq March 12, with or without a UN resolution.
: [Source: Xinhuanet, Tuesday, March 4, 2003.]
: XINHUA HIGHLIGHTS HOON REMARKS BEFORE HOUSE OF COMMONS: NO
: NEED FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS VERSUS IRAQ.
: Obviously feeling the heat
: of the international exposes of the Bush Administration
: utopians'
: schemes to use mini-nuclear weapons against Saddam Hussein in
: an
: Iraq war, British Defense Minister Geoff Hoon told the House
: of
: Commons on Monday, ``Can I make it quite clear that we forsees
: no
: circumstances at the present time where nuclear weapons would
: be
: required'' in a war against Iraq.
: ``I am confident that the United States, like the United
: Kingdom,
: will fully respect its obligations under international law,''
: including conventions banning the use of chemical weapons.
: Back in February, in an interview with BBC television,
: Hoon had been more equivocal about the use of nukes,
: declaring,
: ``We have always made it clear
: that we would reserve the right to use nuclear weapons
: in conditions of extreme self defense
: WIESBADEN, MARCH 4 (EIRNS)--LOOK BACK TO KISSINGER,
: AS THE FIRST TO ACTIVELY PROMOTE
: THE USE OF "MINI-NUKES" into various military
: strategies,
: said a leading strategist, who has done a great deal of work
: on the history of nuclear warfare plans.
: He was speaking to EIR, in response to a discussion
: on EIR's recent groundbreaking material,
: on the "mini-nukes" plans of the utopians.
: He said: "The whole history of nuclear warfare planning,
: since 1945, has been one long attempt, to find a way of USING
: nuclear weapons, without a global war, and creating a global
: radioactive disaster. There has been constant search, which
: has
: taken different forms over recent decades, to find nuclear
: weapons 'so small and harmless', that they can be used in
: regional wars. The first person to enunciate this, was Henry
: Kissinger, in his {Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy}, in the
: 1950s."
: The strategist said a second key individual, is Colin Gray,
: of the University of Hull -- which is an interesting story, in
: and of itself. The late John Erickson always pointed to Gray,
: as
: typical of the emerging "geopolitical madmen"
: threatening the
: planet, and would tell EIR, "He was my student, but then
: he went rotten."
: Gray has been the co-director, with Professor Geoffrey
: Sloan of the Britannia Naval War College, in Dartmouth, UK, of
: the Mackinder Forum, a key forum for geopolitical madness.
: A third key figure in this history, is James Schlesinger,
: and his doctrine of "flexible response."
: Georgetown's Edward
: Luttwak also, for a time, had played around with "small
: nuclear weapons" scenarios.
: The source said: "The consolation in all this, is that
: nobody has succeeded in pulling this off, there is no such
: thing,
: as an unconventional conventional weapon, that would allow for
: the use of nuclear weapons, without creating a radioactive
: desert."
: A second individual, a higher-up in the British strategic-
: military establishment, who was otherwise fully on the
: "war is
: inevitable"/"quick victory in Iraq" line
: (although not himself a
: fan of the Washington Chickenhawk crowd), was aghast at these
: "mini-nuke" plans, declaring, "I am implacably
: opposed to all of
: this, there is no worse signal that we can give North Korea.
: This will blow apart the entire global non-proliferation
: regime,
: if it is allowed to get too far. The whole idea is absolute
: nonsense." He remains convinced, for whatever reason,
: that "the
: political leadership" in the U.S. or UK, would never
: allow
: nuclear weapons to be used in Iraq.
EAGLEBURGER SAID SO
art [8:15 PM]
|